Inotuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: past progress, current research and future directions.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate that was first evaluated in B-cell lymphomas but was subsequently shown to be highly effective in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). INO improved response rates and survival in a randomized study in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL, leading to its regulatory approval in the United States in 2017. While the formal approval for INO is as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory ALL, subsequent studies with INO administered in combination with chemotherapy and/or blinatumomab both in the frontline and salvage settings have yielded promising results. In this review, we discuss the clinical development of INO in ALL, highlighting lessons learned from the initial clinical trials of INO, as well as the many ongoing studies that are seeking to expand the role of INO in ALL.

Inotuzumab in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-A Podcast.

Older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have historically had poor outcomes (5-year survival rate, 20%) with standard intensive and dose-adjusted chemotherapy regimens, due to a high incidence of adverse biologic features including high-risk cytogenetics, presence of TP53 mutations, and poor tolerance to intensive therapy. Thus, there is an unmet medical need in this patient population. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a humanized antibody-drug conjugate that targets CD22-positive leukemic blasts. It is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL and has been shown to be effective and tolerable in older patients. Several ongoing trials in older patients with newly diagnosed ALL have yielded encouraging data with inotuzumab ozogamicin in induction alone and in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy. In this podcast, the authors summarize and highlight some of the recent findings on the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin as induction therapy for older adults with newly diagnosed ALL.

[Sequential therapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by CAR T-cell therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 25-year-old woman with a history of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia over ten years ago was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of leukoblastosis. She was participating in a JPLSG (Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group) clinical study at that time. We diagnosed ALL relapse by multi-color flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow samples at admission, with reference to previous JPLSG data. Because her leukemic cells were resistant to conventional cytotoxic agents, she proceeded to lymphocyte apheresis for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T, Tisagenlecleucel [Tisa-cel]). She received two cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridging therapy to Tisa-cel, resulting in a hematological complete remission (minimal residual disease measured by polymerase chain reaction [PCR-MRD] was positive at 1.0×10-4). She was finally administered Tisa-cel and achieved MRD negativity. She is currently in complete remission with careful MRD monitoring. This strategy of sequential bi-targeted therapy combining antibody conjugates and CAR-T cells provides tumor control in deeper remission and minimal damage to organ function through reduced use of cytotoxic anti-tumor agents. Therefore, we believe that this therapeutic strategy is an effective and rational treatment for adolescent and young adult ALL patients.

Immune therapies of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults.

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-cell ALL) is a common haematologic cancer in children and adults. About 10 percent of children and 50 percent of adults fail to achieve a histological complete remission or subsequently relapse despite current anti-leukaemia drug therapies and/or haematopoietic cell transplants. Several new immune therapies including monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cells are proved safe and effective in this setting. We review data on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immune therapies for B-cell ALL in children and adults including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel. We also summarize pharmaco-dynamics, pharmaco-kinetics, and pharmaco-economics of these interventions.

Dose-Dense Mini-Hyper-CVD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Blinatumomab Achieves Rapid MRD-Negativity in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), with sequential blinatumomab, is highly effective in older adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and in relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL. Earlier, "dose-dense" administration of blinatumomab could lead to earlier and deeper measurable residual disease (MRD) responses and better outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of mini-hyper-CVD (mini-hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with mini-methotrexate and cytarabine), INO, and blinatumomab in patients with B-cell ALL. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated (frontline, n = 9; MRD consolidation, n = 4; relapsed/refractory, n = 8). In the frontline cohort, all patients achieved CR/CRi and MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. Across the frontline and MRD consolidation cohorts, 10/11 patients (91%) achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10-6, including 6/10 evaluable patients (60%) who achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity after cycle 1. The CR/CRi rate in the relapsed/refractory cohort was 63%, and all responders achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. The 1-year overall survival rate for the combined cohort of the frontline and MRD-positive patients was 83%. No new safety signals were observed with the dose-dense mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab regimen. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense delivery of mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab was safe and resulted in rapid and deep MRD negativity in patients with B-cell ALL. This regimen is now being prospectively evaluated in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings.

A multicenter study of posttransplantation low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

ABSTRACT: The curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is hampered by relapse. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to calicheamicin, which has significant activity against ALL. We hypothesized that low-dose INO would be safe and feasible after allo-HCT. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 study to determine the dose and safety in this setting. Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 to 75 years, had undergone allo-HCT for CD22+ ALL, were in complete remission (CR) after allo-HCT, had high risk of recurrence, were between day 40 and 100 after allo-HCT with adequate graft function, and did not have a history of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). The objectives of this trial were to define INO maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to determine post-allo-HCT INO safety, and to measure 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The trial design followed a "3+3" model. The treatment consisted of INO given on day 1 of 28-day cycles. Dose levels were 0.3 mg/m2, 0.4 mg/m2, 0.5 mg/m2, and 0.6 mg/m2. Median age was 44 years (range, 17-66 years; n = 18). Disease status at transplantation was first CR (n = 14) or second CR or beyond (n = 4). Preparative regimen was of reduced intensity in 72% of patients who received transplantation. Most common toxicity was thrombocytopenia. There were no instances of SOS; the MTD was 0.6 mg/m2. One-year nonrelapse mortality was 5.6%. With a median follow-up of 18.1 months (range, 8.6-59 months) 1-year post-allo-HCT PFS and overall survival is 89% and 94%, respectively. Low-dose INO has a favorable safety profile and was associated with high rates of 1-year PFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03104491.

A phase 1/2 study of mini-hyper-CVD plus venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

ABSTRACT: Preclinical studies suggest that Bcl-2 inhibition with venetoclax has antileukemic activity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and may synergize with conventional chemotherapy. We designed a phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-intensity chemotherapy in combination with venetoclax in adults with relapsed or refractory ALL. Patients received the mini-hyper-CVD regimen (dose-attenuated hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine) in combination with venetoclax (200 mg or 400 mg daily) on days 1 to 14 in cycle 1 and on days 1 to 7 in consolidation cycles. Twenty-two patients were treated. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-6). Thirteen patients (59%) had undergone prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), and 7 of 18 patients (39%) with B-cell ALL had previously received both inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab. The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax in the combination regimen was 400 mg daily. The composite complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was 57% (CR, 43%; CRi, 14%), and 45% of responders achieved measurable residual disease negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry. Four patients proceeded to allo-SCT. The median duration of response was 6.3 months. The median overall survival was 7.1 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 29%. The most common grade ≥3 nonhematologic adverse events were infection in 17 patients (77%) and febrile neutropenia in 4 patients (18%). Overall, the combination of mini-hyper-CVD plus venetoclax was active in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory ALL. Further development of venetoclax-based combinations in ALL is warranted. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03808610.

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Induction Therapy for Patients Older Than 55 Years With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Precursor ALL.

PURPOSE: Despite recent advances in adapting the intensity of treatment for older patients with ALL, current protocols are associated with high rates of early deaths, treatment-related toxicity, and dismal prognosis. We evaluated inotuzumab ozogamicin and dexamethasone (Dex) as induction therapy in older patients with ALL within the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The open-label, multicenter, phase II, INITIAL-1 trial enrolled 45 patients older than 55 years with newly diagnosed, CD22-positive, BCR::ABL-negative B-precursor ALL (B-ALL). Patients received up to three cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin/Dex and up to six cycles of age-adapted GMALL consolidation and maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Forty-three evaluable patients with common/pre-B (n = 38) and pro-B ALL (n = 5), with a median age of 64 years (range, 56-80), received at least two cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin induction therapy. All patients achieved complete remission (CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery). Twenty-three (53%) and 30 (71%) patients had no evidence of molecularly assessed measurable residual disease (minimum 10e-4 threshold) after the second and third inductions, respectively. After a median follow-up of 2.7 years, event-free survival at one (primary end point) and 3 years was 88% (95% CI, 79 to 98) and 55% (95% CI, 40 to 71), while overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% CI, 82 to 99) and 73% (95% CI, 59 to 87), respectively. None of the patients died during 6 months after the start of induction. Most common adverse events having common toxicity criteria grade ≥3 during induction were leukocytopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and elevated liver enzymes. One patient developed nonfatal veno-occlusive disease after induction II. CONCLUSION: Inotuzumab ozogamicin-based induction followed by age-adapted chemotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in high rates of remission and OS. These data provide a rationale for integrating inotuzumab ozogamicin into first-line regimens for older patients with B-ALL.

Liver failure after treatment with inotuzumab and polychemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase in a patient with relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We present the case of a 58-year-old female patient who presented with an extramedullary B-ALL relapse after prior allogenic HSCT and blinatumomab therapy. The patient died from complications of a drug-induced acute liver failure after a salvage therapy combining inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO)-based induction followed by consolidation with high dose MTX and pegaspargase based on the GMALL protocol for older ALL patients. After a diagnosis of the extramedullary relapse in the form of a retro vesical chloroma, the patient received an individualized multi-agent chemotherapy based on induction chemotherapy for older patients in combination with InO. After four administrations of InO, in combination with vincristine, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide, CT-imaging showed a reduction in volume of the chloroma and response to therapy. Consolidation with high-dose methotrexate and pegaspargase was administered. The patient developed toxic liver damage manifested by hyperbilirubinemia and progressive hepatic encephalopathy. The diagnostic criteria for VOD were met, and therapy with defibrotide was initiated. Liver biopsy revealed no histological signs of VOD but instead steatohepatitis indicative of drug-induced toxicity. The patient ultimately died of hemorrhagic shock through postinterventional hemorrhage after liver biopsy. In conclusion, although InO shows promising results in the therapy of r/r ALL with and without additional chemotherapy, the combination with MTX and pegaspargase in an intensively pretreated patient with relapse after HCST may impart an increased risk for liver-related toxicity. Special caution is required when assessing fitness for further liver toxic regimens. A key takeaway is also the reminder that InO can cause liver damage not only in the form of VOD but also through direct hepatocellular toxicity.

Real-world use of inotuzumab ozogamicin is associated with lower health care costs than blinatumomab in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the first relapsed/refractory setting.

Aim: To compare all-cause and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and blinatumomab (Blina) for ALL in the first relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Patients & methods: We studied retrospective claims for adult commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with ALL receiving InO (n = 29) or Blina (n = 23) from 1 January 2015 to 16 February 2021. Mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) HCRU and total costs were described and multivariable-adjusted PPPM total all-cause and ALL-related predicted costs were calculated. Results: Mean monthly ALL-related hospitalizations were the same for patients receiving InO and Blina (PPPM = 0.8 stays); however, the length of ALL-related hospital stay was almost twice as long among patients receiving Blina versus InO (ALL-related: InO = 7.6 days; Blina = 14.1 days; p = 0.346). In multivariable models, total ALL-related costs were 43% lower for InO compared with Blina (PPPM costs: InO = $93,767; Blina = $163,470; p = 0.021). Conclusion: In the first R/R setting, patients who used InO had significantly lower all-cause and ALL-related costs compared with patients who used Blina, in part driven by hospitalization patterns.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Approach to Older Adults With Phildadelphia-Chromosome Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Philadelphia-chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has historically been associated with poor outcomes in older patients due to adverse disease biology, as well as inferior tolerance of conventional chemotherapy. Fortunately, novel therapies, including inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, and venetoclax, are now being incorporated into first-line therapy to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity of initial therapy. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, alone or in combination with low intensity chemotherapy, appears to be best suited for the induction phase of treatment due to efficacy in the setting of high tumor burden. In contrast, blinatumomab may be best suited for consolidation due to superior efficacy in setting of morphologic remission, with or without measurable residual disease (MRD). Venetoclax is being investigated in combination with chemotherapy and can be used for treatment of older adults with both B-cell and T-cell ALL. Ongoing trials incorporating inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and venetoclax demonstrate high rates of MRD-negative complete remissions with low early mortality. Long-term outcomes have been less favorable so far, with several trials reporting nonrelapse mortality during subsequent treatment. Unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL, including central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, the most appropriate consolidation to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy, and the role of transplant and cellular therapy. T-cell ALL remains an area of unmet need and effort is required to ensure that therapeutic advances benefit all populations equitably. In this manuscript, we review current data and ongoing trials regarding the treatment of older adults with Ph-neg ALL and define topics for further research.

[CAR-T therapy for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

Although adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) responds to initial treatment, relapse and refractory cases are common. Even when these cases are treated with novel agents (blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, etc.) and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the prognosis remains poor. Recently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, targeting CD19, has demonstrated great potential in treating relapsed or refractory B-ALL. We have already used tisagenlecleucel in clinical practice, but it is limited to patients up to 25 years of age. This review summarizes the most recent evidence on CAR-T therapy for relapsed or refractory adult B-ALL, which has a poor prognosis when assessed in younger patients.

[Relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia responding to retreatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin].

A 72-year-old man with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) was treated with dasatinib (week1: 50 mg/day, week2: 70 mg/day, week3-: 100 mg/day) and prednisolone from June 2017. However, in January 2018, it relapsed with the T315I mutation. Although the treatment was changed to ponatinib 30 mg/day, he experienced a second relapse in June 2018. Following confirmation of CD22 positivity, he was treated with three cycles of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), resulting in CR. He was CR for 2.9 years before relapsing for the third time in May 2021. Because the patient was still CD22-positive, InO was given again, and the patient achieved CR at the end of the second cycle. We had a case where re-administering InO was effective as a salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL (r/r Ph+ALL) in an elderly patient.

Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has improved over time with the incorporation of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment landscape as well as the recent approval of immunotherapeutic agents allowing a larger proportion of patients to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) which is still considered a potential curative approach. However, relapse post-transplant is still occurring and constitutes a common cause of treatment failure in B-ALL. The present review aims to discuss the novel strategies and therapies used to prevent and overcome relapse post allo-HCT in patients with ALL, focusing on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome positive B-ALL, the role of innovative agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin, and finally the role of cellular therapy.

Expert Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Latin America.

PURPOSE: Despite strong induction chemotherapy response rates, only 30%-40% of patients with adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) attain long-term remission. This study analyzes ALL in Latin America (LA) and recommends diagnosis, treatment, and management protocols. METHODS: The Americas Health Foundation organized a panel of hematologists from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico to examine ALL diagnosis and therapy and produce recommendations. RESULTS: Lack of regional data, unequal access to diagnosis and therapy, inadequate treatment response, and uneven health care distribution complicate adult ALL management. The panel recommended diagnosis, first-line and refractory treatment, and post-transplantation maintenance. Targeted treatments, including rituximab, blinatumomab, and inotuzumab ozogamicin, are becoming available in LA and must be equitably accessed. CONCLUSION: This review adapts global information on treating ALL to LA. Governments, the medical community, society, academia, industry, and patient advocates must work together to improve policies.

Mini-hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab ozogamicin, with or without blinatumomab, in the subgroup of older patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia: long-term results of an open-label phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of older patients with B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia is inferior to that in younger patients due to the adverse disease biology and their inability to tolerate intensive therapy. We aimed to study the long-term outcomes of inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy in these patients. METHODS: For this open-label phase 2 trial, patients aged 60 years or older with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia-chromosome negative, B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and an ECOG performance status of 3 or lower were eligible. This study was conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The induction chemotherapy consisted of mini-hyper-CVD and has been published before; inotuzumab ozogamicin was administered intravenously on day 3 of the first four cycles at a dose of 1·3-1·8 mg/m2 in cycle 1, followed by 1·0-1·3 mg/m2 in subsequent cycles (cycles 2-4). Maintenance therapy with dose-reduced POMP (6-mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone) was given for 3 years. From patient 50 onwards, the study protocol was amended to fractionate inotuzumab ozogamicin to a maximum cumulative dose of 2·7 mg/m2 (0·9 mg/m2 during cycle 1 fractionated into 0·6 mg/m2 on day 2 and 0·3 mg/m2 on day 8 of cycle 1, and 0·6 mg/m2 in cycles 2-4 fractionated into 0·3 mg/m2 on day 2 and 0·3 mg/m2 on day 8) followed by blinatumomab for four cycles (cycles 5-8). POMP maintenance was shortened to 12 cycles with one cycle of blinatumomab administered by continuous infusion after every three cycles of POMP. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01371630) and the present data is from the newly diagnosed, older subgroup of patients treated on the phase 2 portion of this trial; the trial is still enrolling patients. RESULTS: Between Nov 11, 2011, and March 31, 2022, 80 patients were enrolled and treated (32 female and 48 male patients; median age 68 years [IQR 63-72]), 31 of whom were treated after the protocol amendment. With a median follow-up of 92·8 months (IQR 8·8-67·4), the 2-year progression-free survival was 58·2% (95% CI 46·7-68·2) and 5-year progression-free survival was 44·0% (31·2-54·3). At a median follow-up of 104·4 months (IQR 6·6-89·2) for the patients treated before the protocol amendment and 29·7 months (8·8-41·0) for those treated after the protocol amendment, median progression-free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (34·7 months [95% CI 15·0-68·3] vs 56·4 months [11·3-69·7]; p=0·77). The most common grade 3-4 events were thrombocytopenia in 62 (78%) patients and febrile neutropenia in 26 (32%) patients. Six (8%) patients developed hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. There were eight (10%) deaths due to infectious complications, nine (11%) from complications related to secondary myeloid malignancy, and four (5%) from sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. INTERPRETATION: Inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab added to low-intensity chemotherapy showed promising activity in terms of progression-free survival in older patients with B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. Further attenuation of the chemotherapy regimen might improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy in older patients. FUNDING: Pfizer and Amgen.

Results of salvage therapy with mini-hyper-CVD and inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Historically, adults with relapsed-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) experienced poor outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. This mature analysis explores the benefit of the addition of sequential blinatumomab to low-intensity mini-Hyper-CVD chemotherapy with inotuzumab ozogamicin in this setting. METHODS: Mini-Hyper-CVD (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone at 50% dose reduction, no anthracycline, methotrexate at 75% dose reduction, cytarabine at 83% dose reduction) was combined with inotuzumab during the first 4 courses. From Patient #68 and onwards, inotuzumab was given in reduced and fractionated doses, and blinatumomab was added sequentially for 4 courses. Maintenance therapy with prednisone, vincristine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate was given for 12 courses, and blinatumomab for 4 additional courses. RESULTS: Among 110 patients (median age, 37 years) treated, 91 (83%) responded (complete response, 69 patients, 63%). Measurable residual disease negativity was documented in 75 patients (82% of responders). Fifty-three patients (48%) received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome occurred in 9/67 patients (13%) on the original inotuzumab schedule and in 1/43 (2%) on the modified schedule. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 17 months, and the 3 year OS was 40%. The 3 year OS was 34% with mini-Hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab and 52% with additional blinatumomab (P = 0.16). By landmark analysis at 4 months, the 3 year OS was 54%, similar between patients who did or did not receive allogeneic SCT. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity mini-Hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab with or without blinatumomab showed efficacy in patients with relapsed-refractory ALL, with better survival after the addition of blinatumomab. Trial registration The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT01371630.

Real-world treatment patterns of novel drugs in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in Japan.

Aim: To evaluate treatment patterns of novel therapies (inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab), blinatumomab, and tisagenlecleucel) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a Japanese real-world setting. Patients & Methods: Patients with ALL diagnoses from a Japanese claims database were examined. Results: We included 194 patients (97 patients were prescribed inotuzumab; 97 patients were prescribed blinatumomab; and no patient was prescribed tisagenlecleucel); 81.4% in the inotuzumab group and 78.4% in the blinatumomab group were prescribed chemotherapy prior to the initiation of those drugs. Most patients were prescribed subsequent treatment (60.8 and 58.8%, respectively). A small number of patients were prescribed sequential treatment of inotuzumab-to-blinatumomab or blinatumomab-to-inotuzumab (20.3 and 10.5%, respectively). Conclusion: This study revealed inotuzumab and blinatumomab treatment features in Japan.

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the increase in leukemic cells prevents the production of normal blood cells. As a result, people with ALL become more susceptible to anemia, fatigue, infections, fever, bruising and bleeding easily. ALL progresses rapidly without treatment. In recent years, new therapeutic drugs, including inotuzumab and blinatumomab, have become available; however, it remains unclear how they have been used in clinical practice. In this report, we assess how they are used in clinical practice using a large database to collect the clinical data of ALL patients. To see the treatment pattern, we found that most of the patients (81.4% of patients who received inotuzumab and 78.4% of those who received blinatumomab) had received chemotherapy before starting treatment with inotuzumab or blinatumomab. After patients ended treatment with inotuzumab or blinatumomab, 60.8% of patients who received inotuzumab and 58.8% of those who received blinatumomab received the next therapies, including chemotherapy. However, a small number of patients had received inotuzumab-to-blinatumomab or blinatumomab-to-inotuzumab (20.3 and 10.5%, respectively). These findings show the real-world treatment patterns of inotuzumab and blinatumomab; that is, both inotuzumab and blinatumomab are more likely to be prescribed to patients who might not have enough efficacy from prior chemotherapy or might have had to stop chemotherapy early due to side effects. Overall, there is clinical meaningful information from our findings of how inotuzumab and blinatumomab have been used for treatment of ALL and this information could improve the clinical practice of ALL in Japan.

Using immunotherapy and novel trial designs to optimise front-line therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: breaking with the traditions of the past.

Multidrug chemotherapy has historically been the cornerstone of therapy for both children and adults with acute lymphocytic leukaemia. However, in the past decade, several novel immunotherapies have proven to be highly effective in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukaemia, including the anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin, the CD3 × CD19 bispecific antibody blinatumomab, and two CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products. These agents are all approved in the USA as monotherapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia. However, their use as single agents in the salvage setting might not be taking full advantage of their anti-leukaemia potential, because our ability to cure a patient is likely to be greatest when the most effective therapies are safety integrated into front-line treatment regimens. Several ongoing studies have yielded encouraging data with routine incorporation of inotuzumab ozogamicin or blinatumomab, or both, in patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphocytic leukaemia, and these approaches are emerging as new standards of care. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia, chemotherapy-free regimens combining blinatumomab and a BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor are changing acute lymphocytic leukaemia therapy, highlighting the potential for these novel agents to reduce-or perhaps eliminate-the need for chemotherapy in some subtypes. In this Viewpoint, we review promising data from ongoing clinical trials of novel immunotherapy-based combinations that are being explored in patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphocytic leukaemia. We also discuss the challenges of randomised studies in the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape and argue for the ability of well designed, non-randomised studies to more rapidly advance the standard of care in acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

High response rates and transition to transplant after novel targeted and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia-like fusions.

Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy. However, outcomes with novel antibody and cellular therapies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Ph-like ALL are largely unknown. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 96) with r/r B-ALL and fusions associated with Ph-like who received novel salvage therapies. Patients were treated with 149 individual novel regimens (blinatumomab = 83, inotuzumab ozogamicin [InO] = 36, and CD19CAR T cells = 30). The median age at first novel salvage therapy was 36 years (range; 18-71). Ph-like fusions were IGH::CRLF2 (n = 48), P2RY8::CRLF2 (n = 26), JAK2 (n = 9), ABL-class (n = 8), EPOR::IGH (n = 4) and ETV6::NTRK2 (n = 1). CD19CAR T cells were administered later in the course of therapy compared to blinatumomab and InO (p < .001) and more frequently in recipients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) (p = .002). Blinatumomab was administered at an older age compared to InO and CAR T-cells (p = .004). The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 63%, 72%, and 90% following blinatumomab, InO and CD19CAR, respectively, among which 50%, 50%, and 44% of responders underwent consolidation with alloHCT, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the type of novel therapy (p = .044) and pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .006) predicted the CR/CRi rate, while the Ph-like fusion subtype (p = .016), pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .022) and post-response consolidation with alloHCT (p < .001) influenced event-free survival. In conclusion, novel therapies are effective in inducing high remission rates in patients with r/r Ph-like ALL and successfully transitioning the responders to alloHCT.